Fuel Question
Hamdog
Member Posts: 247 ✭✭
My 342 is on the hard right now being repaired from storm damage. Looks like we will launch a week from tomorrow. I can stop and fuel up before launching but it will have to be Ethanol fuel. The marina has non-ethanol. Is the cost savings worth the one time addition of the ethanol? Never had ethanol in her before. Would you fill up with the highest octane or stick with the mid grade stuff? I am guessing it would save me about $175.00.
"Wetted" Bliss 2005 Rinker 342 - Black Hull - Twin Mercruiser 350 Mags - BIII's
Comments
you'll run a tad warmer.
run a bottle of star tron with it... it'll offset much of the corrosive nature of the stuff, which is the issue with boats and ethanol- as well as time... alcohol attracts water, and depending on how long it sits is how much you'll accumulate... you'll only save about $165 if you follow this advice.. higher octane is always better to control pre-detonation... pre-detonation is a risk but one that's easily mitigated by having a healthy engine and fuel system, and having timing correctly set with good plugs.
Boat Name: King Kong
"Boat + Water = Fun"
Boat Name: King Kong
"Boat + Water = Fun"
PC BYC, Holland, MI
Back to the OP, I can't get ethanol free fuel either in Western PA, I I fill up and add Marine Stabl to my fuel. I put as much in as I have since you can't put too much in. You will burn thru it before you know it.
Go Steelers!!!
Almost forgot, activecaptain.com is a great source of info for local marina gas prices and such.
Dave
2002 Captiva 212, 5.0 220 hp, Alpha 1, 1.62 gears
Moon Township, PA - boating in the Ohio River
Ethanol free is about 3.50 up here right now, and the only e10 station I'd go to on the water is 2.69
PC BYC, Holland, MI
@JoeStang, very interesting and correct comment. My uncle used to work for one of the largest oil companies in the world in an executive position in research. That's who turned me on to synthetic oils, good filters and keeping engine/drive/transmissions cool.
He HATED ethanol fuels. Their company research tests showed 20% loss of vehicular power under load. He used to get red faced when anyone said the word ethanol. He said that crap ruined engines and related equipment and cost more for the consumer because it burned like sh*t.
Then he'd get going on the "real costs" of corn for fuel growth!
I guess he passed on his hatred of ethanol to me as I hate that sh*t too!
Now if we can just get Obama into retirement before his wife mandates E85!
Sorry....I feel better now! :-)
Your uncle must not have known much about engines, alcohol is a GREAT fuel. Its just a lot of engines are not designed to utilize its high octane.
ethanol has a great octane rating of 99, which allows very high compression ratios to be used if the engine is designed to use it. It burns clean and is sustainable.
Go down to the drag strip and watch some alcohol powered drag cars.
Brazil seems to have adopted well to using ethanol... we are just behind the times.
And yes it can pick up more water, however incorrect fuel storage and old school venting are the issues, along with improper fuel line materials and engine materials.
Dont blame the fuel type, blame the poor engineering. Time to get out of the 1960s
we should all be thinking of ditching these current designs anyway in favour of battery packs and electric motors anyway. Alcohol is just a stepping stone.
X
I found a station close to where the boat is being launched tomorrow that has Ethanol free gasoline. Question is which Octane should I fill up with? I am guessing middle grade 89 at a minimum?
Thanks.
Al-
I've seen ethanol kill small engines... especially small engine with soft lines like weed eaters and leaf blowers. I rebuilt a 360 a few years ago and put a tunnel ram intake on it... the kit came with a cheap crossover line for the rails, which I didn't anticipate so I used it for a short time... and swapped it no more than two months later for a good-year proper FI line (blue lining)... that thing was almost toast in that short a period. I did some research on the matter, and pegged it to the ethanol.. Since then, rec fuel is readily available at a lot of places, some within a 1/4 mile of me..
watching the computer fuel trim, STFT's were crossing zero regularly while running rec fuel.. running ethanol (15% here) would run hotter and demand more as witnessed on the lambdas... spark would advance in the low forties on the rec fuel where it wouldn't hardly touch 37 on the ethanol..
At the same time, I pulled a fuel pump from the tank of that truck, and markings were gone- the label eaten... I put a new one in, and pulled it later when I put a larger tank on the truck, and it was eaten alive in less than six months submerged in the ethanol fuel... meanwhile, and after talking about this with a friend who is a offroad fabricator/builder, he used blue fuel exclusively in his rig... he rolled a mudder and while srapping it (same exact model of fuel pump in that tank) it was still pretty much pristine.
then there is volume of sales and in ground tanks to concern about... water accumulating...
then there is mileage which rec fuel almost (almost) makes up for the difference in cost- I doc'd 3 MPG's better running rec fuel in a 426 Buick and about 1.5 in a 4.0 inline.
newer ignitions (fatter spark, timing accounting for it) help... different materials in the fuel system (less reactive to the solvent nature of alcohol) help... sooner or later, either ethanol will go away, or builders will take it into account (if they haven't already)...
All, the biggest impact I see is on small 2 stroke engines, in their carbs and the soft lines nowadays. Every gas engine I have runs better when it's rec gas being burned, but other than that, there are no big issues anymore.