192 vs 212

jminzjminz Member Posts: 21 ✭✭
I currently have a 2005 captiva 192. There is a locally listed 2005 captiva 212 in excellent condition. I really love the layout of my 192, but would really like a couple more feet. If I could get out of my 192 and into the 212 for around 4 grand, would it be worth it?

Comments

  • halifax212halifax212 Member Posts: 553 ✭✭✭
    Well you will get an extra 6" beam for stability as well as the additional 2 feet in length making everything that much roomier. The layout is basically the same but the U shape seating and full 6' pad are that much better. That 6' pad opens to the stern giving a big space for maintenance as well as a large bucket for storage(can be removed for great working area around motor). Mine has the 5.7 300hp which gets 4 people on plane in about 3 seconds. 
  • mvnmvn Member, Moderator Posts: 753 mod
    I moved up from a 192 to the newer version  of the 212, a 226.  The extra elbow room makes a huge difference and the stability in rougher water is great.  The extended swim platform on the 192 is bigger than the integrated one on the 226 although the 212 may have the same larger one.  You won't regret it! 

    Mark 
    Good,  fast,  cheap.... pick two. 
    2019 MTX20 Extreme

  • jminzjminz Member Posts: 21 ✭✭
    Well you will get an extra 6" beam for stability as well as the additional 2 feet in length making everything that much roomier. The layout is basically the same but the U shape seating and full 6' pad are that much better. That 6' pad opens to the stern giving a big space for maintenance as well as a large bucket for storage(can be removed for great working area around motor). Mine has the 5.7 300hp which gets 4 people on plane in about 3 seconds. 
    The one I'm looking at has the 5.0. I'm hoping that's still plenty of power. He has it priced at 20k. It is in immaculate condition with 350 hrs. I'm honestly not sure if the price is fair or not. 
  • halifax212halifax212 Member Posts: 553 ✭✭✭
    The 5.7 will get you on plane a bit quicker but the 5.0 should be fine. I bought mine in 2009 for $16,900(bank repo days) and no disappointments at all. Currently at 350 hours. If they are selling for around 20K today I think I did alright. Get him down a couple grand and go for it.
  • 212rowboat212rowboat Member Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i don't know where you're boating, but in coastal carolina, where commuting out to the sand bar with gear enough for the day and a few friends, there really isn't a superior to the 212 platform- there are those that are as good, and there are those that are a lot more expensive if bling is your flavor, but that's all you'll be doing above the 212 in my area,  and for my purpose, anyway. longer runs to town/dinner are comfortable, and the boat is stout enough to not fear the occasional "got caught out in a storm or strong seas".    

    the 5.0 is fine, even with water sports- just prop accordingly.  

    right now I'm torn- repowering again- and can't decide if i want a brand new mercruiser built 300hp catalyst engine, or if i should just build another.... when it's all said and done, the new engine will cost around $10k........... that ought to tell you something, that I'm not interested in tossing the platform just because of an engine, and that I'm willing to drop that kind of cash in a 2005 boat.  
  • jminzjminz Member Posts: 21 ✭✭
    212rowboat said: 
    i don't know where you're boating, but in coastal carolina, where commuting out to the sand bar with gear enough for the day and a few friends, there really isn't a superior to the 212 platform- there are those that are as good, and there are those that are a lot more expensive if bling is your flavor, but that's all you'll be doing above the 212 in my area,  and for my purpose, anyway. longer runs to town/dinner are comfortable, and the boat is stout enough to not fear the occasional "got caught out in a storm or strong seas".    

    the 5.0 is fine, even with water sports- just prop accordingly.  

    right now I'm torn- repowering again- and can't decide if i want a brand new mercruiser built 300hp catalyst engine, or if i should just build another.... when it's all said and done, the new engine will cost around $10k........... that ought to tell you something, that I'm not interested in tossing the platform just because of an engine, and that I'm willing to drop that kind of cash in a 2005 boat.  
    How many hours on your 5.0? I'm assuming 350 hrs is nothing to be concerned about on the 212 I'm looking at.
  • 212rowboat212rowboat Member Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭✭✭
    fresh water or salt?  

    mine was original with a 4.3.... propped right it was marginal performance.  it topped at a touch over 40- no bueno.  i'm not a speed freak, but i do believe being agile and that being able to sprint faster than most boats is actually far safer than a slower boat.  

    so... i sealed the motor mount holes and tapped four more forward, and dropped in a pretty haphazardly built 305 (bored to 314, sausage cam, 58cc bowls, port matched- nothing crazy, but enough to sniff likely 250~270ish w/o much problem through a 650cfm carb and HEI ignition, it had nice low end)... that boat came ALIVE.  it was now sniffing 60mph and the five blade prop would hold plane at 2400rpm and around 20mph iirc.  i'd have to go back and look at notes for specifics.  it was a bit of overkill. 

    the 305 is enough for the 212.  

  • jminzjminz Member Posts: 21 ✭✭
    fresh water or salt?  

    mine was original with a 4.3.... propped right it was marginal performance.  it topped at a touch over 40- no bueno.  i'm not a speed freak, but i do believe being agile and that being able to sprint faster than most boats is actually far safer than a slower boat.  

    so... i sealed the motor mount holes and tapped four more forward, and dropped in a pretty haphazardly built 305 (bored to 314, sausage cam, 58cc bowls, port matched- nothing crazy, but enough to sniff likely 250~270ish w/o much problem through a 650cfm carb and HEI ignition, it had nice low end)... that boat came ALIVE.  it was now sniffing 60mph and the five blade prop would hold plane at 2400rpm and around 20mph iirc.  i'd have to go back and look at notes for specifics.  it was a bit of overkill. 

    the 305 is enough for the 212.  

    It's a fresh water boat. I know the 212 is what I want, just trying to justify the ditching my 192 for it. Really love the fuel economy of my 192 but it's cramped. With the 212 I'll be getting 6" wider beam to go along with 2 additional feet. And with the 212 only being 500lbs heavier than the 192 I'm really thinking the 5.0mpi will be plenty of power. 
  • 212rowboat212rowboat Member Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭✭✭
    it will be... and freshwater, 350hours isn't a big deal so long as it was properly cared for. 

    MPI or carb? 

    MPI spreads the love much better than TBI or a carb... if it's a carb or TBI, get a compression and leak down on at least the corners- cylinders one, two, seven, and eight. all eight would be better- but carbs and TBI often lean those cylinders out and that will show on the test... observe the business end of the plugs while doing to- compare them to a chart to tell you how and what that engine is doing.

    pull the PCV valve out and shake it- it should rattle... if it doesn't and it isn't obviously aged, sticky blow-by will make the ball stuck- evidence of worn rings.  

    bend the plug wires over themselves in a few spots- namely the coil wire as it sees exactly eight times the spark the others do- you're looking for cracks.  it means not a lot by itself- but if they are obviously new it doesn't make a lot of sense why they're there if it's being sold, and if they're cracked all to pieces it demonstrates maintenance was lacking.  pull the dizzy cap and look at the rotor button too- excessive wear, like- to a nub- indicates maintenance wasn't a high priority to the owner... brand new, gotta wonder why, moderate wear or signs of use within reasonable tolerance, and it's likely okay.  

    look at bolt heads on the intake manifold and where ever you can see any bolt head on the engine for that matter.  most these engines are hit with a stout epoxy before being planted- most people who have needed to turn those bolts (internal repairs) don't repaint them.  it's a quick and dirty way to tell, and good place to start asking questions.

    observe the venting hoses and listen to the blower.  shoddy vent hoses indicates lack of owners attention to detail about something pretty important. 
      
    look closely at the gear lube reservoir.  these things are notorious for gumming up in the bottom- if it is, don't think less of the owner, it happens... absolutely clean? wonder why- if it's absolutely clean, look at the lower end on the drive to see if the drain paint is disturbed- as in recently- and pop that thing out- sniff the gear oil and rub it between your fingers.  it may look clear (as clear as gear oil can get) but still have water intrusion... rub it between your fingers- if there is any evidence of off color or whitish/grayish after doing so, that's a good indicator of water intrusion somebody drained/filled trying to hide.  

    spin the prop by hand- feel for any catches.  don't worry about what appears to be wobbly by observing the outside of the hub at the exhausts tip, but stare at the union- where the prop hub enters the lower housing- make sure that gap is uniform while that prop spins- otherwise you could be having a bent shaft.    

    shift the gears forward, neutral, and reverse slowly and pausing only momentarily when you feel the gear 'seat'.   make sure that 'seat' is in the same spot every time- not a half inch this way or that....  

    the seats are clipped in.  pull them off the clips and determine if there holding any water.  the ski locker ought to have a clean bottom- sand, debris and such shows the thing doesn't drain that well.  

    If i think of anything else i'll update. 
  • jminzjminz Member Posts: 21 ✭✭
    Oh I'll most definitely take it to get evaluated before buying.
Sign In or Register to comment.